Why is this? Visual confirmation again - except this time, the generic character doesn't show how powerful he is through his combat ability or through his characterisation, leaving the only medium for him to be visually identified as a "strong" character is how powerful his gear looks.Īt the heart of it, in all the examples I mentioned, the character does get stronger - experience and new skills are in all of the above games. It's also interesting to note how exacerbated this is in on-line gaming - the famous "pauldrons" symptom in World of Warcraft, where each iteration of end-game content produces even more ridiculous shoulder armour. A generic character such as Harry the High Elf in Skyrim can't express that through characterisation as much, so we rely on the visual confirmation of how shiny he's getting. Let's use the Witcher for example - there is a constant improvement in Geralt's fighting style that's very visible, but his gear doesn't improve all that drastically - his improvement is most visible in how he fights and how he expresses that as a character. The issue resides in visual confirmation - I'd hazard to say that a majority of players enjoy the feeling of constant improvement, and it's most evident when placed alongside a confirming feature like a constantly more impressive visual of their character rather than higher damage numbers.Ĭonsider the difference in a single-player RPG that uses a written-in main character rather than a faceless / generic player character. TL DR If your only able to defeat Diablo because of your 'EPIC GEAR' you are not much of a warrior. This leads to poorer story telling, and prevents people being drawn further into games like these. I like finding treasure etc in these sort of games, but it seems to me that it is becoming easier and easier to find said treasure, which means you loss some wonder in finding it.īy focusing on gear that gives the character the power to face greater foes, we take away any power that the character could have develop in themselves. For it is not the weapon that makes the warrior, but the skill heart and courage of the warrior himself.
After many moons he become a Blademaster, still armed with that old sword. He acquires a nicked sword, which he trains with everyday. It is tough but he get better and stronger. He fights with a spear in a rusting chain coat. Who is a better fighter? The guy with the magical gear who has got to level 80, or the farmer, who lost his family. This means we look at Gandalf and not he blade when we see him fighting. It has certain powers to be true, but they are not obvious. It look like a well made but still mundane sword. Lets look at Glamdring The Foe Hammer Ok it has a fancy name, but is usual referred to as Glamdring. King Leonidas did not wield a Holy Spear of Smiting! In almost all other media heros do not wander around in ridiculous armour, bearing weapons with crazy names, even stranger appearances and so forth.
#Stick rpg 2 glowy sword full
Gandalf did not wear a full Mythweave set. You have to of course, because if you don't you have no chance of progressing with the story and so forth. It made more sense for this savage Nord, fighting for the freedom of Skyrim, to be glad in simple clothes with simple arms, not elven armour, with a Daedric weapon. It looked better on my character as I was playing him. In Skyrim for example, I refused to give up on the hide armour. I always find myself getting frustrated by having to take fancier looking gear and weapons in these sort of games. Its is a trope, or at least I see it to be, that at Max Level or End Game your character must have the greatest glowing weapon of all time, that drinks the blood of its foes, and does +10% damage to all humanoids, and gives a +20% to sex appeal! I struggle to find the appeal in this. r/CoOpGaming - A community for co-op gaming r/xboxone - Xbox-specific subreddit for general Xbox news and discussion r/playstation, /r/PS4 & /r/PS5 - PlayStation-specific subreddits for general PlayStation news and discussion
#Stick rpg 2 glowy sword Pc
r/pcgaming - PC gaming-specific subreddit for general PC gaming news, discussion and gaming tech support
r/nintendo - Nintendo-specific subreddit for general Nintendo news and discussion
r/shouldibuythisgame - Find out what's worth getting. r/gamingsuggestions - Go here to help you find your next game to play r/gaming4gamers - Discussion, bar the Hivemind Top-level comments must be at least 100 characters in length.Accounts must be at least one month old.External Links must follow these guidelines No topics that belong in other subreddits This subreddit shouldn't be used for advice of any kind. Use sufficient detail and examples from multiple sources.Clearly define the purpose of your post.Engage in good faith with the points the person you're replying to is making.No discrimination or “isms” of any kind (racism, sexism, etc).Discuss GamingĪll discussion must be about gaming 2.
0 kommentar(er)
